article · Smart Learning Environments
Abstract Developing students’ technical competencies and self-regulated learning has become a priority in robotics and computing education, yet little is known about the mechanisms through which technical competence contributes to goal-setting behaviours in authentic learning environments. Drawing on Social Cognitive Theory and Goal-Setting Theory, we examined whether science-related attitudes mediate the relationship between technical competencies and robotics goal-setting skills and whether prior knowledge moderates this process. A total of 530 undergraduate students from Nigerian higher education institutions participated in a 15-week Arduino-supported Project-Based Learning intervention. Prior knowledge was assessed before the intervention, whereas technical competencies, science-related attitudes, and robotics goal-setting skills were measured concurrently at post-intervention. The hypothesised first stage moderated mediation model was analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling with the SmartPLS PROCESS module and examined in a complementary robustness analysis using Hayes’ PROCESS macro in SPSS, with 10,000 bootstrap resamples. Results showed that technical competencies significantly and positively predicted robotics goal-setting skills and science-related attitudes. However, science-related attitudes did not significantly predict goal-setting skills or mediate the relationship between competence and goal setting. Prior knowledge did not significantly moderate the relationship between technical competencies and science-related attitudes, and the conditional indirect effect was unsupported. These results refine the joint application of Social Cognitive Theory and Goal-Setting Theory by suggesting that technical competence is associated with goal setting primarily through a direct competence-based pathway rather than the proposed attitudinal mechanism. This study underscores the importance of combining hands-on, feedback-rich robotics experiences with explicit goal-setting and self-regulatory strategies in higher education.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s40561-026-00463-z
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.