conference paper
Educational robotics has increasingly emerged as a powerful approach for promoting authentic, hands-on computing experiences that integrate programming, problem solving, and collaboration in both K–12 and teacher education contexts [17]. Empirical evidence suggests that robotics-based learning yields moderate to large gains in academic achievement, computational thinking, and programming competence compared to traditional instruction [8, 11, 13, 15]. However, despite these advances, limited research has examined the specific learner-level process factors that predict achievement in project-based robotics programming, particularly among preservice teachers [12]. Existing studies tend to emphasize instructional effects or broad outcomes, with less attention to how cognitive and social processes jointly shape programming success.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1145/3765965.3816661
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.