MARATTO

article · Food Chemistry Advances

Predictive modeling of Salmonella inactivation in a hybrid alternative protein matrix: A comparative evaluation of mechanistic and machine learning approaches

2026Open accessUniversité Ibn Zohr

Abstract

• ML ensembles surpassed mechanistic baselines in predicting Salmonella inactivation. • Random Forest performed best with an R 2 of 0.91 for Salmonella inactivation. • SHAP analysis revealed complex interactions between OEO, pH, and temperature. • Validation in commercial hybrid matrices revealed a significant protective effect Ensuring microbial safety remains a key issue in the alternative protein industry. This study examined the inactivation kinetics of Salmonella , a common foodborne pathogen, in a model protein matrix. A Doehlert response surface design experiment was used to evaluate the effects of oregano essential oil (OEO) concentrations (0–0.3% v/w), pH levels (4.7–6.8), sodium chloride concentrations (0.9–3.8% w/w) and temperatures (8–20°C). Primary mechanistic modelling indicated that the biphasic model was the best fit for 73.9% of individual experiments, suggesting the presence of stress-resistant microbial populations. For global predictive models, machine learning algorithms outperformed global mechanistic models. The Random Forest (RF) model achieved the best performance with R² = 0.91, RMSE = 0.52, B f = 1.09 and A f = 2.24, followed by XGBoost. Validation conducted using a commercial hybrid protein substrate demonstrated the protective effect of the matrix. However, the RF model demonstrated strong relative performance (R² = 0.75; RMSE = 1.04) compared to the one-step global Weibull model. Chemical profiling using GC-MS and sensory profiling using an electronic tongue revealed the effects of the matrices on volatile antimicrobial agents. These findings establish a data-driven approach for safety-by-design in the alternative protein industry.

Research topics

  • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.focha.2026.101261

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.