article · IPS Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Legumes, particularly cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), are an important source of nutrients, especially in developing countries. Despite being part of the staple diets of these populations, the consumption of cowpea is limited by the flatulence they produce. Natural lactic acid fermentation has proven to be an effective method to decrease flatulence-producing compounds. However, in order to use this method as a process on a large scale, it is fundamental to identify the microbial flora involved. When fermented seeds of Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea) were analyzed microbiologically, it was found that the micro-organisms present were Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus cellobiosus and Lactobacillus plantarum. On performing back-slopping or induced fermentation, there was a significant (p≤0.05) increase in the protein from 23.1% in raw sample to 25.5% in the fermented product; and a 57.3%, 53.3% and 38.9% respective decreases in oxalate, phytate and tannin contents, when compared to the raw sample. When cooking of the spontaneous and induced fermented samples was done there was a reduction in the anti-nutritional components and thus increase in potassium and phosphorus contents of the samples from 385.67±0.56 mg/100g and 459.33±0.56 mg/100g in the raw sample to 417.00±0.00 mg/100g and 435.33±0.56 mg/100g in the product, for the spontaneous and induced fermented samples, respectively. There was also a significant (p≤0.05) reduction in the bulk density from 0.76 ±0.03 g/cm3 in raw samples to 0.65± 0.01 g/cm3 and 0.60± 0.01 g/cm3 in spontaneous and induced fermented cowpea seeds, underscoring the usefulness of the fermented product in weaning diets formulation, with increases in the water absorption, oil absorption and emulsifying capacities. All these results demonstrate that the lactic acid bacteria used for the induced fermentation (or back-slopping) can lead to a functional food with improved nutritional quality.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.54117/ijamb.v4i2.61
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.