MARATTO

article · International Journal of Food Properties

Evaluation of morphological diversity, nutritional potential, and techno-functional properties of improved soybean ( <i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.) accessions and varieties cultivated in Niger

Abstract

Food insecurity and malnutrition remain major challenges in Niger, where protein-rich crops are critically needed. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is recognized as a strategic legume due to its high protein content (typically 35–45%) and valuable techno-functional properties reported in the literature. However, local accessions and improved soybean varieties cultivated in Niger remain poorly characterized in terms of their nutritional and techno-functional potential. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the morphological traits, nutritional composition, and techno-functional properties of 12 local soybean accessions and 3 improved varieties cultivated in different agro-ecological zones of Niger. Samples were analyzed in triplicate using standard gravimetric, potentiometric, and functional property assessment methods. Protein contents ranged from 35.89 ± 0.26% to 40.58 ± 1.25%, values comparable to or slightly lower than those reported for improved soybean cultivars worldwide (≈40–45%). Lipid contents varied from 9.83 ± 1.07% to 18.47 ± 1.27%. Water absorption capacity ranged from 187.01 ± 2.51% to 289.00 ± 9.31%, while oil absorption capacity varied from 125.40 ± 5.90% to 175.87 ± 0.13%, indicating good functional performance relative to reference legume flours. Solubility reached up to 48.80%, particularly for accession AC34 (Tara), whereas swelling power remained modest (4.11–6.68 g/g). These results highlight the nutritional and techno-functional potential of both local accessions and improved soybean varieties, supporting their use in food formulation and their valorization as a strategy to enhance food and nutritional security in Niger.

Research topics

  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Soybean genetics and cultivation
  • Agricultural pest management studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2026.2627049

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.