MARATTO

preprint

Effects of an 80-10-10 Multilingual CTCA-Harlybot Model on Achievement and Critical Thinking in Mobile and Adaptive Systems

2026Open accessFountain University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> This study compared the effects of three instructional approaches on university students’ achievement (retention) and critical-thinking skills in a Mobile and Adaptive Systems course: (a) traditional lecture, (b) Harlybot-supported Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA) delivered in 100% English (monolingual), and (c) Harlybot-supported CTCA using an 80% English + 10% Nigerian Pidgin + 10% Yoruba strategic code-switching model (80-10-10 multilingual). A pre-post quasi-experimental design with 75 second-year undergraduates was employed. Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) had previously identified the OSI Model as the most difficult concept, justifying the intervention focus. MANCOVA (covariates: pre-tests) revealed no significant differences in achievement (retention) or critical-thinking scores across the three conditions (p &gt; .05). However, the 80-10-10 multilingual group consistently displayed the highest adjusted means on both outcomes, with moderate-to-large effect sizes (η² = .09–.14). Qualitative data from think-aloud protocols and post-intervention focus groups explained the pattern: brief, culturally anchored code-switches at OSI encapsulation/de-encapsulation moments reduced extraneous cognitive load and increased germane processing without compromising academic identity. The findings extend Okebukola’s Eco-Techno-Cultural Theory by quantifying the optimal cultural-linguistic dosage (≤ 20%) for cognitively demanding computing topics in African multilingual universities.

Research topics

  • Mobile Learning in Education
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8626009/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.