MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Effect of faba bean-garlic intercropping on low-molecular-weight organic acids, yield components, and profitability under different spatial arrangements

2026Open accessBenha University

Abstract

Abstract A two-year field experiment was conducted to quantify the influence of spatial configuration on soil organic acids, agronomic traits, competitive indices, and economic returns in faba bean-garlic intercropping. Intercropping patterns, particularly the faba bean-garlic side-by-side arrangement (1SF:1SG), remarkably increased rhizosphere levels of ascorbic, salicylic, citric, oxalic, and total organic acids. Notably, the alternating ridge arrangement (2RF:2RG) maximized the stem and whole-plant dry weight of faba bean, whereas the 1SF:1SG pattern produced the heaviest fresh and dry bulb weights of garlic in both seasons. The highest yields were obtained from sole cropping, with 4275.20 kg ha −1 for faba bean and 16.07 t ha −1 for garlic, while the 2RF:2RG pattern was the top-performing intercrop, yielding 4004.06 kg ha −1 and 10.98 t ha −1 , respectively. This pattern also optimized the land equivalent ratio and relative crowding coefficient. Garlic was the dominant competitor, exhibiting significantly greater competition ratio and aggressivity than faba bean ( p < 0.05). Economically, the 2RF:2RG was the most profitable, achieving the maximum net returns of $3260.3 and $3980.7 ha −1 in the first and second seasons, respectively. Multivariate analyses, including Pearson’s correlation, PCA, radar plot, hierarchical clustering, confirmed that the 2RF:2RG produced a distinctly favorable profile for yield and competitive traits, thereby enhancing overall profitability.

Research topics

  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-49974-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.