article · Eng—Advances in Engineering
The growing demand for elderly and bedridden patient care in hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities has increased the need for safe and efficient repositioning methods. Repositioning immobile patients is essential for preventing pressure injuries and other complications associated with prolonged immobility. However, this task is still commonly performed manually using bed sheets, pillows, and similar support aids, making it physically demanding and increasing the risk of musculoskeletal injury among caregivers. This paper presents a two-stage soft growing robot for safe and assisted patient repositioning from a supine posture to a side-lying position. The proposed mechanism consists of two soft pneumatic chambers with distinct roles. The first chamber enables pressure-driven eversion, allowing the robot to deploy smoothly beneath the patient with minimal friction. The second chamber is then pressurized to generate the lifting and rolling motion required for repositioning. A first-principles dynamic model of the pressure-driven vine robot is developed by integrating pneumatic supply dynamics, internal pressure evolution, and tip-extension mechanics within a Lagrangian framework. Based on this model, a robust multi-stage nonlinear model predictive control strategy is formulated to regulate deployment beneath the patient under parameter uncertainty. The rolling dynamics of the second stage are also analyzed to determine the minimum pressure required for repositioning as a function of patient weight and roll angle. Simulation results show that the proposed controller achieves smooth and accurate deployment while satisfying input and state constraints under uncertainty. The rolling analysis further indicates that the required pressure increases with patient weight and decreases with roll angle. These findings demonstrate the potential of the proposed mechanism to reduce caregiver effort and enable safe, controlled patient repositioning.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/eng7060277
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.