article · Frontiers in Food Science and Technology
The use of gluten-free ingredients in the baking of cookies is increasing due to gluten-associated disorder and other nutritional-related non-communicable diseases, and consumer's pursuit for health-promoting foods. In this study, gluten-free cookies (GFC) were made from biofortified yellow maize supplemented with sodium carboxyl methylcellulose (SCMC), a reference hydrocolloid, and Brachystegia eurycoma flour (BEF) at four different proportions (2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10%), respectively. The GFC were then assessed for their bioactive components (flavonoids, tannins, and saponins), carotenoids, starch-hydrolyzing enzymes (alpha-amylase and alphaglucosidase), and glycemic index. Cookies made from commercial wheat flour (100% CWF) served as control. The total flavonoid contents of the 100% BYF cookies (144.48 ± 0.18 mg/g) and saponins (1.04 ± 0.00 mg/g) were significantly ( p < 0.05) higher than the 100% CWF cookies (93.84 ± 0.36 mg/g; 1.02 ± 0.00 mg/g). The total tannin contents of the cookies ranged from 3.12 ± 0.00 mg/g (100% CWF) to 4.87 ± 0.00 mg/g (2.5%BEF-97.5% BYF). The carotenoid profiles indicated the presence of lutein (range from 0.62 to 1.63 μg/g), β-carotene (range from 3.81 to 6.06 μg/g), β-cryptoxanthin (range from 0.19 to 1.75 μg/g) and zeaxanthin (range from 0.83 to 2.48 μg/g) in the cookies. Further, the GF cookies significantly ( p < 0.05) inhibited the alpha-amylase (IC 50 value ranged from 1.42 ± 0.01 μg/mL (100% BYF) to 2.63 ± 0.01 μg/mL (100% CWF)) and alpha-glucosidase with IC 50 value range from 1.12 ± 0.01 μg/mL (2.5%SCMC-97.5% BYF) to 6.72 ± 0.01 (7.5%BEF-92.5% BYF). The GF cookies showed a low glycemic index (GI) value (GI < 50). The biofortified yellow maize-based GFC have significant amounts of bioactive compounds and anti-hyperglycemic properties, and low GI. Hence, they can serve as functional baked food with potential health benefits.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/frfst.2024.1365021
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.