MARATTO

article · LWT

Bacillus cereus group in sufu: Traceability, potential pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance based on 175 strains whole-genome sequencing

2026Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

This study investigated species composition, contamination sources, pathogenic potential, and antibiotic resistance of 175 Bacillus cereus group strains isolated from sufu samples, raw and auxiliary materials, production line, and processing environments using whole-genome sequencing and phenotypic analysis. Six species were identified, primarily B . cereus , Bacillus pacificus , and Bacillus paranthracis . Multilocus sequence typing identified 66 sequence types (STs), including 19 novel STs. Traceability analysis demonstrated that the production environment is a likely reservoir for B . pacificus ST90 contamination, while ST2567 in the production environment may cause B . paranthracis contamination. All strains harbored diarrheal virulence genes, whereas no emetic toxin genes were found. Moreover, B . pacificus and B . paranthracis almost lack hblCDA compared to B . cereus . Twelve antibiotic resistance genes were identified, mainly fosB , followed by BcII . Notably, 77.71% contained 3 or more distinct resistance gene classes. Thirty-seven isolates exhibited phenotypic resistance, primarily to tetracycline and chloramphenicol (CHL), including 3 multidrug-resistant isolates and 1 CHL-resistant B . pacificus from sufu. Genome-wide association studies and functional protein annotation indicated associations between resistance phenotypes and genotypes. This study provides the first systematic genomic analysis of the B . cereus group throughout sufu production, supporting risk assessment and targeted control of fermented soybean products.

Research topics

  • Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2026.119806

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.