article · Journal of Asian and African Studies
This study explores how Nigerian aviation authorities and operators use language to (de)legitimise actions and assert institutional power in press statements. Grounded in Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of critical discourse analysis and van Leeuwen’s framework of legitimation, the study analyses press releases revolving around incidences of misdemeanour involving King Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (KWAM 1) and Ms Comfort Emmanson – two major incidents that have been given wide media coverage in Nigeria in recent times. Five key discursive strategies emerged: hedging, institutional legitimation, authoritative modality, descriptive amplification, and evaluative counter-narration. These strategies operate in tandem, forming a rhetorical network through which disciplinary actions are justified and public credibility is maintained. The findings suggest that regulatory authority in Nigeria’s aviation sector is not solely exercised through formal procedures but is deeply embedded in strategic discourse.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1177/00219096261447229
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.