MARATTO

article · IJTLD OPEN

Xpert MTB/XDR implementation in South Africa: cost outcomes of centralised vs. decentralised approaches

20245 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

In plain language

The abstract on record is too brief for a reliable plain-language summary, so none has been generated.

Abstract

Centralising the implementation of XDR testing, as compared to LPAfl/LPAsl, leads to significant cost savings.

Research topics

  • ICT Impact and Policies
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Educational Technology and Optimization

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0501

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.