article · Social Sciences
Informal waste picking and scrap collection constitute critical yet highly precarious livelihood strategies among economically marginalised women in rural South Africa. This article presents a cross-sectional mixed-methods study, guided by Sen’s Capability Approach as its analytical framework, examining the lived experiences, motivations, and livelihood outcomes of 126 Black African women engaged in scrap collection along the N2 Highway in the Eastern Cape, specifically in Mthatha, Xhora, and Qumbu. The study integrates quantitative descriptive statistics with qualitative thematic analysis derived from structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. The findings indicate that participation in scrap collection is overwhelmingly driven by structural economic constraints, including chronic unemployment, household poverty, and extensive caregiving responsibilities, rather than autonomous occupational choice. The sample is characterised by limited educational attainment, frequently disrupted by poverty, bereavement, early marriage, and early caregiving roles, which collectively constrain access to formal employment opportunities. Participants consistently described scrap collection as physically hazardous, economically insecure, and detrimental to both physical health and psychosocial wellbeing, while remaining indispensable for household survival. Through the lens of the Capability Approach, these conditions reflect severe restrictions in substantive freedoms, particularly in relation to economic security, bodily health and human dignity. Expressions of acceptance are interpreted as manifestations of adaptive preferences formed under conditions of prolonged structural deprivation rather than indicators of genuine agency. The study contributes to informal economy scholarship by demonstrating how intersecting structural inequalities constrain capability sets and limit livelihood trajectories and calls for targeted policy interventions to enhance occupational safety, income security and access to sustainable livelihood alternatives.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/socsci15060397
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.