MARATTO

article · Review of Development Economics

Why cash grants fail to raise household investment in child education in developing countries

Abstract

Abstract This study formulates a theoretical framework to shed light on why cash grants fail to increase parental investment in child education, and what can be done to address the issue. The paper asserts that consumption vulnerability, loss aversion, and information friction render lump‐sum cash grants ineffective. Redesigning interventions as demand‐side cost‐sharing schemes would nudge parents to buy educational materials for their children.

Research topics

  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Income, Poverty, and Inequality

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/rode.13092

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.