MARATTO

preprint · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Why a Femtometre Spacetime Lattice Need Not Violate Lorentz Invariance

Abstract

For decades, the notion of a discrete vacuum lattice at the femtometre scale has been dismissed on a single ground: it must violate Lorentz invariance catastrophically.This despite the idea's pedigree --- Dirac's quantum aether, Sakharov's induced gravity, Volovik's superfluid vacuum, Kleinert's defect--gauge correspondence --- and the deep structural parallels between crystalline defects and the field content of general relativity. The dismissal, however, assumes the simplest possible model: a rigid array of motionless point scatterers. We show that the lattice becomes fully compatible with current astrophysical bounds once the substrate is modelled as a relativistic quantum supersolid whose nodes are spatially extended bound states delocalised by zero-point motion. Two well-established crystallographic mechanisms --- the Peierls--Nabarro form factor and the Debye--Waller factor --- then combine to suppress coherent Bragg scattering by at least eighteen orders of magnitude, placing the predicted dispersion comfortably below the Fermi-LAT bound. A Peach--Koehler analysis separates this periodic-background transparency from stress-field coupling to topological defects, which survives undiminished --- consistent with the Kleinert programme in which gauge fields and gravity emerge precisely from such defect interactions.The primary phenomenological obstacle to lattice-based models of fundamental physics is, at minimum, substantially weakened.

Research topics

  • Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
  • Relativity and Gravitational Theory

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18739954

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.