MARATTO

article · Journal of the Egyptian Womenʼs Dermatologic Society

Weekend systemic isotretinoin for maintaining acne remission: a novel approach

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Background Oral isotretinoin is a highly effective treatment for nodulocystic acne. However, relapse rates can reach 60% post-treatment, necessitating maintenance therapy. Objective To compare the efficacy and tolerability of two 12-months maintenance regimens: weekend oral isotretinoin and alternate-day topical adapalene gel, following successful oral isotretinoin therapy Patients and methods A total of 60 acne patients were randomized into three groups: group A received oral isotretinoin at a cumulative dose of 120–150 mg/kg, followed by topical adapalene; group B received the same cumulative dose as group A, followed by weekend oral isotretinoin; and group C received oral isotretinoin until clearance, followed by weekend oral isotretinoin. Results Time to acne clearance showed nonsignificant difference between groups ( P =0.563). However, group A had a significantly higher rate of relapse (85%) compared with groups B (35%, P =0.001) and C (45%, P =0.008). Time to relapse was the shortest for group A versus either group B or C ( P =0.001 for each) with no significant difference between the latter two groups ( P =0.579). Side effects during maintenance were significantly less severe than during the initial treatment phase. Conclusion Maintenance therapy is crucial to prevent acne relapse. The study provides a novel, practical comparison of long-term maintenance regimens using low-dose oral isotretinoin versus topical adapalene in preventing acne relapse after isotretinoin treatment. Weekend oral isotretinoin is an effective and well-tolerated option for maintaining remission.

Research topics

  • Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Dermatologic Treatments and Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/jewd.jewd_12_25

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.