MARATTO

article · Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research

Web metrics and key performance indices of the Villagemath instructional content repository

2024Open accessUniversity of Zululand

Abstract

This study presents the outcomes of common web metrics and key performance indices of VillageMath, an online culture-based Instructional Content Repository for STEM learners and teachers. The study adopts a developmental research design. The developed intervention is accessible at (https://villagemath.net). Data collection on common web metrics and key performance indices (KPIs) was handled using standard web performance assessment tools such as WP Statistics, Pingdom Tools, Google PageSpeed Insights, GTmetrix, and WebPage Test. The metric platforms were chosen based on their industry standing, ease of use, and the wide range of KPIs that they measure. The metrics provide a median run performance result accounting for Time to First Byte (when did the content start downloading?), Start Render (when did pixels start to appear?), Speed Index (how soon did the page look usable?), Cumulative Layout Shift (how much did the design shift while loading?), Page Weight (how many bytes downloaded?), speed (from 7 different locations on five continents strategically placed around the globe), total page size, and suggestions for improvement. The data collected was analysed using descriptive statistics such as tables, charts, and averages. The analysis of results obtained from the web performance assessment tools indicated that the web-based VillageMath Repository appeals to a wide range of highly engaged users. Key performance indicators such as speed index, page size, and last painted hero for the VillageMath Instructional Content Repository were above industry averages and affirmed that the platform is robust, elegantly designed, and fast.

Research topics

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Educational Technology and Assessment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.27

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.