article · JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences
Non-destructive evaluation techniques for assessing pile foundations have gained significant importance in geotechnical and structural engineering. This study thoroughly assesses the advancements in pile integrity testing from the early days toward current approaches. The study reviews the advancements in pile integrity testing, from early methodologies to modern approaches, while proposing a unique classification of techniques based on their focus: whether they involve the procedure of pile integrity testing or the interpretation of test findings. The analysis declares substantial advancements in testing methodologies, signal processing, and data interpretation techniques for evaluating the structural integrity of deep foundations. The concepts of wave propagation are essential for detecting and evaluating structural flaws, enabling engineers to check pile quality without affecting structural integrity. The review highlights significant issues in pile integrity assessment involving the influence of soil conditions, geometric changes, and material variability on test outcomes. Recent advances have improved the accuracy of flaw detection, enabling real-time monitoring of foundations. Advanced computer techniques now enable more precise test analysis and structural assessments, significantly improving foundation evaluation and safety. This investigation establishes the practical and theoretical basis for implementing advanced machine learning predictive models that combine previous records with pattern recognition algorithms, potentially converting traditional PIT interpretation from an uncertain process to a reliable and precise evaluation system. Conclusions suggest that existing pile integrity testing methods offer thorough solutions for early problem identification and quality assurance in foundation engineering, while also indicating new possibilities for future study and development.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.386836.1521
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.