MARATTO

article · BMC Infectious Diseases

Virological outcomes of dolutegravir-based versus other antiretroviral regimens in people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2026Open accessMekelle University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG) is endorsed as a preferred option for both first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, comprehensive high-quality evidence regarding its virological effectiveness is still limited. This review evaluates and compares virological outcomes of DTG-based regimens with other ART options among people living with HIV. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DTG with other antiretroviral therapy regimens and reporting virological outcomes at 48 and/or 96 weeks were included. Study quality was evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Fixed and random effects models were applied to calculate pooled proportions and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals, with a statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs including 8,360 participants were analyzed. In treatment-naïve adult individuals, DTG-based ART achieved significantly higher viral suppression than comparator ART at week 48 (RD; 0.03(95% CI 0.00, 0.05), P = 0.02 and week 96 (RD; 0.037(95% CI:0.012, 0.062). P < 0.001. In treatment-experienced adult individuals with suppressed baseline viral load, switching to DTG/lamivudine maintained virological suppression without increased risk of failure (RD; 0.00(95% CI: −0.03, 0.04), P = 0.9. Dolutegravir efficacy was consistent across baseline viral load and CD4 subgroups but superior to low-dose efavirenz-based ART (RD; 0.06(95%CI;0.01,0.11), P = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir-based ART provide superior viral suppression in treatment-naïve and maintain durable suppression in treatment-experienced adult individuals including those switching to DTG/lamivudine. These findings support DTG as a preferred first-line therapy and an effective option for regimen simplification. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Research topics

  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV Research and Treatment

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12879-026-13098-9

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.