MARATTO

article · World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Verification of the analytical performance of the serum gamma-glutamyl transferase assay on the Abbott Alinity ci®: Experience of the biochemistry laboratory of the Mohammed VI university hospital of Oujda

2023Open accessMohamed I University

Abstract

Introduction: As part of our study, we set out to evaluate the analytical performance of the gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) assay using an Abbott kit on the Alinity ci® automated system in the biochemistry laboratory of the CHU Mohammed VI in Oujda. Materials and methods: This study assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of Alinity ci® and compared the results obtained by the Alinity ci® and Architect ci-8200® automated systems. Results: The results obtained met the acceptability criteria recommended by the supplier and the Valtec protocol of the Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC), demonstrating overall satisfaction with the study. The Alinity ci® automated system demonstrated the analytical performance required for accurate and reliable determination of GGT levels. Discussion: Validation of an analytical method is an essential step in guaranteeing that the result obtained is as close as possible to the reference value of a sample. Several standards and technical guides set out requirements for the performance criteria of an analytical method, notably NF EN ISO 15 189. Conclusion: the verification study of the GGT assay method produced satisfactory results, providing a high level of reliability for analysis results from the central laboratory of the CHU Mohammed VI d'Ouja. This work forms an essential basis for developing an accreditation procedure, which is part of the quality approach to which our laboratory is committed.

Research topics

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2023.15.2.0349

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.