MARATTO

article · Journal of African clinical cases and reviews.

Value of Fundus Examination in Screening for HIV Infection

Abstract

Retinal microangiopathy is one of the known manifestations of HIV infection, sometimes misleading as it closely resembles that observed in diabetic or hypertensive retinopathy. It reflects a systemic microangiopathy for which the retina offers a true window into the microcirculation. It may reveal a previously unknown infection or allow for evolutionary monitoring. We report two observations where the discovery of signs of retinal microangiopathy led to the diagnosis of HIV seropositivity. The first case is that of a 34-year-old man, with no history of arterial hypertension, diabetes, or known seropositivity, presenting with left ocular redness corresponding to a temporal and inferior subconjunctival hemorrhage. Fundus examination revealed a few rare cotton-wool spots, microaneurysms, and punctate hemorrhages at the posterior pole. Blood pressure and blood glucose were normal, and HIV serology was positive. The patient, referred for specialized consultation, was lost to follow-up. The second case concerns a 26-year-old woman, with no particular history, referred for a stage 2 pterygium of the right eye. Systematic fundus examination revealed a few cotton-wool spots at the posterior pole, without retinal hemorrhage. Blood pressure and blood glucose were normal, HIV serology was positive. She was also lost to follow-up. These observations highlight the importance of fundus examination as a tool for early screening. Any unexplained retinal microangiopathy, particularly in young subjects without cardiovascular risk factors, should prompt investigation for HIV infection. Keywords: Fundus examination; Retinal hemorrhage; Retinal microangiopathy; Cotton-wool spot; HIV.

Research topics

  • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.70065/26101.jaccrafri.006l013003

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.