article
Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains a serious complication following allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our objectives were to explore the impact of pre-transplant anti-CMV IgG titers in both donor and recipient on the occurrence of post-transplant CMV reactivation and to determine a threshold titer that would allow for better stratification of the post-transplant reactivation risk. We conducted a case-control study involving pediatric allo-HSCT recipients. We included 24 cases and 48 randomly selected controls. In univariate analysis, D-/R+ pre-transplant CMV serostatus (p=0.013), recipient anti-CMV IgG titer (p=0.012) and anti-CMV IgG titer R/D ratio (p=0.049) were associated with CMV reactivation. Donor anti-CMV IgG titer was a protective factor (p=0.046). Multivariate analysis showed that D-/R+ pre-transplant CMV serologic status (adjusted OR=6.874; 95% CI (1.37 – 34.4); p=0.019) and recipient anti-CMV IgG titer (adjusted OR=1.005; 95% CI (1.00 – 1.01); p=0.033) were independent risk factors. ROC curve analysis showed that optimal cut-off value to predict CMV reactivation was 113.75 AU/ml for the recipient anti-CMV IgG titer (Se=72.2%; Sp= 64.9%; AUC=0.701; p=0.016) and 1 for the anti-CMV IgG titer R/D ratio (Se=77.8%; Sp=78.4%; AUC=0.814; p<0.001). The prevalence of CMV reactivation was higher in patients with pre-transplant anti-CMV IgG titer >113.75 AU/mL (50% versus 16%; p= 0.002) and in those with anti-CMV IgG titer R/D ratio >1 (64% versus 15%; p<0.001). In summary, we have shown that both pre-transplant anti-CMV IgG titer in recipient and anti-CMV IgG titer R/D ratio were associated with the risk of CMV reactivation following allo-HSCT. Furthermore, a high pre-transplant anti-CMV IgG titer in the donor would be a protective factor. These findings would be useful for better risk stratification of CMV reactivation and adaptation of surveillance strategies.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.22541/au.176518995.57222205/v1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.