MARATTO

article · The Egyptian Journal of Haematology

Validity of different hematological indices to differentiate between iron deficiency anemia and beta-thalassemia trait

Abstract

Background Several discrimination formulas have been proposed as a quick simple screening tool to differentiate between beta-thalassemia trait (βTT) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) using red blood cells (RBCs) parameters. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability of some of the RBC indices and formulas used in the differentiation between βTT and IDA among Egyptian children. Patients and methods A total of 110 patients (50 βTT, 50 IDA, and 10 combined βTT and IDA) were enrolled. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for different discriminating formulas, and a receiver operative characteristic curve was plotted for each one to check its discriminative effectiveness in β-thalassemia detection. Results RBC count has the highest accuracy among other RBC parameters with accuracy of 82%, sensitivity 90%, and specificity 70%. Green and King index then red blood cell distribution width index were the best with the accuracy of 93.2% and 92.8%, respectively. 11 T score showed the highest accuracy over all with accuracy of 94.9%, sensitivity of 88%, and the highest specificity over all of 92%. Conclusion 11 T score can be considered as a simple and accurate tool to discriminate between βTT and IDA.

Research topics

  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/ejh.ejh_100_23

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.