MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Using qualitative risk assessment to re-evaluate the veterinary fence paradigm within the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area

2026Open accessUniversity of Botswana

Abstract

Based on low estimated risks, sections of all three fences could be considered for removal, but further information was needed for the Western Border fence. Key stakeholders established consensus to move forward with consultations with local communities and to offer assistance with the implementation of risk mitigation measures (such as improved herding, kraaling) conditionally associated with potential removal of key fence sections. Opening the fences in key low-risk areas would restore connectivity for elephants and other wildlife and potentially reduce human-wildlife conflict in areas where high densities of elephants are constrained by fences. This new, more sectorally integrative approach to livestock disease control is vital to wildlife's ability to access key resources over space and time and thus to the sustained success of KAZA.

Research topics

  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Viral Infections and Vectors

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1702631

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.