article · Journal of the West African College of Surgeons
Background: Traditionally, arch bars are used for mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF) following mandibular fractures. Intermaxillary fixation screws (IMFS) are a suitable alternative to mitigate the drawbacks of arch bar fixation. Aims and Objectives: We compared the use of arch bars versus IMFS for treatment of mandibular fractures including evaluation of sonographic findings and the patients' quality of Life (QoL). Study Design: This is a randomised prospective study. Setting: The study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with mandibular fractures were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, 25 each in the arch bars and IMFS treatment groups. The parameters evaluated were as follows: mouth opening, malocclusion, pain, fracture healing using an ultrasound scanner, operating time, wire-prick injuries, oral hygiene, and QoL. Results: = 0.25) were observed in the arch bar group. An ultrasound scan at 6 postoperative weeks showed complete hyperechoic bridging callus in (61.5%) the arch bar group and (50%) in the IMF screw group, with no statistically significant difference. Regarding the QoL, patients treated with arch bars had more difficulty in continuing with their normal diet and indicated "they will not undergo the same treatment again." On the other hand, IMFS patients had significantly isolated themselves because of feelings of bad mood, and their sleep and speech patterns were significantly affected. Conclusions: Although some similarities were observed in both groups, this study observed that IMFS addressed some of the limitations associated with arch bars such as prolonged operative time, wire-prick injury, and poor oral hygiene. Therefore IMFS is relatively safer and can be used for long-time MMF. Trial registration number: PACTR202408851121914. Date of registration: 04 July 2024, "retrospectively registered." Clinical trial registry: Pan African clinical trials registry.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_145_24
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.