article · BMC Medical Education
BACKGROUND: Mobile medical apps have greatly enhanced access to healthcare information and clinical decision-making globally. However, their use in Sudan faces numerous barriers, despite the growing adoption worldwide. There is limited information on how Sudanese medical students and healthcare providers utilize these apps, the challenges they face, and how these tools affect clinical decisions. This study aimed to examine usage patterns, perceived barriers, and perceived impact of mobile medical applications on clinical decision-making and learning among medical students and junior doctors in Sudan to inform future digital curriculum integration. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students in the clinical phase (4th, 5th, and 6th years), house officers, and general practitioners practicing in Sudan. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 2,945 participants completed the survey, including medical students (66.3%) and house officers or general practitioners (33.7%). Overall, 94% owned a smartphone or tablet capable of running medical applications. 80% reported using mobile medical apps during clinical training or practice, with significantly higher use among house officers and GPs than among medical students (89.0% vs. 75.0%; p < 0.001). Usage patterns differed by academic level, with junior doctors more often using clinically oriented apps for guideline reviews, drug information verification, treatment decisions, and on-call or emergencies. In contrast, students mainly used apps for academic reviews and exam preparation. The most common barrier was the cost of a paid subscription (48.0%). Participants generally viewed mobile medical applications positively, considering them accurate, time-saving, confidence-boosting, and helpful for inpatient care. CONCLUSION: The widespread use of medical apps, particularly among junior doctors, suggests a high readiness for digital integration; however, addressing subscription costs and providing institutional training is essential to bridge the gap between academic study and clinical application.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-026-09528-6
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
