article · Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research
Classroom participation is a potent predictor of students' learning interest and academic success. Despite the South African government's significant investment and bursaries for students in higher education, poor class attendance, participation, and learning outcomes persist. This study examined the extent of and the relationship between collaborative learning, peer assessment, and undergraduates' classroom participation, as well as the perceived strategies for its promotion. Underpinned by the Scaffolding and Social Learning Theories, the study utilised a survey research design of a non-experimental nature. The population for this study comprised undergraduates who were enrolled in the 2024 academic year at the Faculty of Education, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa. A sample of 315 students was selected using purposive and convenience sampling techniques. A questionnaire titled "Undergraduates' Classroom Participation Factors Questionnaire (UCPFQ)" with a = 0.71, 0.83, 0.76, and 0.77 for the four subsections was used for data collection. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics at a 0.05 significance level. Results indicate that over 70% of students reported actively participating in class, over 80% reported learning collaboratively, and over 90% reported being favourably disposed to peer assessment. Collaborative learning, peer assessment, and classroom participation strategies significantly contribute to students' classroom participation, with collaborative learning being the strongest significant predictor of classroom participation. Strategies for fostering classroom participation were highlighted. The study recommends, among other things, that professional development programmes be provided for lecturers on how to promote collaborative learning, peer assessment, and classroom participation among students.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.38140/ijer-2026.vol8.1.10
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.