article · Diseases
This case highlights the challenges of relying solely on AMH as a predictive marker of ovarian response. Although AMH is widely used for assessing ovarian reserve and stimulation outcomes, its limitations become evident in atypical cases. The paradoxical hyperresponse observed here may result from alternative regulatory mechanisms influenced by elevated LH levels, enhanced gonadotropin receptor sensitivity, or local ovarian factors. This report underscores the need for a personalized, multidimensional approach combining hormonal profiles, ultrasound assessments, and clinical history to optimize stimulation protocols and mitigate risks such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Such tailored protocols are essential for managing patients with complex profiles, particularly those with undetectable AMH levels. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind these atypical ovarian responses, including the roles of genetic polymorphisms, inflammatory markers, and environmental factors. This case demonstrates the importance of cautious interpretation of AMH results and emphasizes the value of comprehensive evaluations in assisted reproductive technologies.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/diseases13110379
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.