review · Machining Science and Technology
AbstractMaterial is removed during electrical discharge machining (EDM) because of the high temperatures. Hence, tiny components of the tool and workpiece melt and evaporate, causing molten metal to solidify and form debris. This debris affects process efficiency if not flushed out. To ensure continuous flushing, tools, workpiece or dielectric motion are necessary. Introducing ultrasonic vibrational motion to the tool, workpiece or the dielectric liquid became a viable alternative for the evacuation of debris during the ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining (USEDM) and ultrasonic assisted micro-electrical discharge machining (USµEDM) processes. In addition to the US vibration, powder mixed to the dielectric medium, using gas as a dielectric medium, and adopting the magnetic field (MF) assistance in USEDM are additional attempts to improve the performance of these processes. This article reviews the main research directions, process parameters and performance indicators of USEDM and USµEDM processes. Extra enhancement to their performance using powder mixing, gas or MF assistance was also presented. Numerous modeling and optimization methods have also been examined. The study demonstrated the benefits of using US vibration assistance to EDM and micro-electrical discharge machining regarding a faster material removal rate, improved surface quality and decreased electrode wear rate. Finally, the current article identifies potential directions for future studies.Keywords: AmplitudeEDMfrequencymagnetic fieldmaterial removal ratenano-powdersurface roughnesstool wearultrasonicvibration Author contributionsNot applicable.Ethical approval statementNot applicable.Consent formNot applicable.Consent for publicationNot applicable.Disclosure statementThe authors declare no conflict of interest.Data availability statementNot applicable.Code availability statementNot applicable.Additional informationFundingThis work received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2023.2263780
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.