MARATTO

preprint · F1000Research

Typhoid diagnosis and associated prevailing drug resistance in Mbale city, Uganda

2024Open accessMakerere University

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background The study aimed at determining the predictive values of Widal’s test against culture and the antimicrobial sensitivity profile of <ns3:italic>Salmonella typhi</ns3:italic> (<ns3:italic>S. typhi</ns3:italic>) isolates from patients attending private health facilities in Mbale city, Uganda. This was to provide evidence-based information to policy implementers for guideline enforcement. Methods This was a quantitative cross-sectional study in which 172 participants were recruited. Blood and stool samples collected were cultured; and to each stool sample the following tests were done; Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD), <ns3:italic>Salmonella Shigella</ns3:italic> agar (SSA), and MacConkey. Isolates suggestive for <ns3:italic>S. typhi</ns3:italic> were examined with triple sugar iron (TSI) and SIM (Sulphur, indole, and motile) and antibiotic sensitivity test (Ciprofloxacin, Imipenem, Ceftriaxone, Chloramphenicol and Augmentin for sensitivity testing) conducted with Mueller Hinton respectively. Generated data was entered in the Epidemiological information (Epi Info) software (version 7) and analyzed using the contingency table to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and the negative predictive value. The analysis was then presented in form of graphs and tables. Results The positive predictive value (PPV) for Widal’s test was 6.8% while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. Three isolates were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (3, 100%) and Imipenem (3, 100%), intermediate to Ceftriaxone (2, 67%) and resistant to Chloramphenicol (2, 67%) and Augmentin (2, 67%). Conclusion In comparison with culture, Widal’s test is highly sensitive (100%) with a low specificity of 76% and PPV (6.8%) and NPV (100%). It should therefore be followed up with a more specific confirmatory test. <ns3:italic>S. typhi</ns3:italic> was highly sensitive to both Ciprofloxacin and Imipenem; and resistant Chloramphenicol and Augmentin.</ns3:p>

Research topics

  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.109968.2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.