article · Results in Materials
Particulate palm kernel shell (PKS) and calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) reinforced high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites offer advantages of environmental friendliness, high stiffness, and sustainability. However, the empirical design of these materials remains costly and time-consuming due to the complex, non-linear interplay between filler composition, particle morphology, and mechanical response. Here, we present a machine learning (ML) framework to predict the full tensile stress-strain response of PKS/CaCO 3 /HDPE composites, providing a more comprehensive representation of mechanical behaviour than single-value tensile strength prediction. Using 8,284 stress-strain data points from 8 experimental compositions derived from our previous experimental work, we engineered key features including volume fraction, interparticle spacing, surface area interaction, and strain-extension coupling to capture underlying deformation mechanisms. Nine ML algorithms were benchmarked, with Extra Trees Regressor emerging as the best-performing model. A full-feature Model A (including tensile modulus) achieved R 2 =0.9998, MAE=0.0385N/mm 2 , and RMSE=0.0621N/mm 2 on the held-out test set. A composition-only Model B (tensile modulus excluded) achieved R 2 =0.9982, MAE=0.0634N/mm 2 , and MAPE=0.46%, demonstrating that accurate prediction is achievable without any prior mechanical testing. Learning curve analysis confirmed negligible overfitting in both models, with train-CV generalisation gaps of 0.0002 (Model A) and 0.0005 (Model B). SHAP analysis revealed non-linear dependencies on tensile modulus, strain, PKS content, and interparticle spacing. This ML framework reduces the need for extensive mechanical testing, accelerates sustainable composite design, and provides interpretable structure-property insights — contributing to more efficient, data-driven development of bio-based green materials aligned with SDG9.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinma.2026.100950
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.