MARATTO

article · Journal of the West African College of Surgeons

Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Sextant versus 12-Core Protocol

In plain language

Prostate cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among middle-aged men in Nigeria, with biopsy remaining the only definitive diagnostic method. This hospital-based study evaluated 138 men aged between 37 and 89 years to compare the cancer detection rates of two transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy approaches: the traditional six-sextant protocol and an extended 12-core protocol that combines sextant and lateral cores. Overall, 78 participants were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The standard sextant method identified 78.2 percent of these cases, whereas the lateral cores detected 98.7 percent. Combining both into an extended 12-core procedure yielded an overall 21.8 percent improvement in cancer detection compared to the sextant method alone. The advantage of the extended approach was particularly pronounced in patients with lower prostate-specific antigen levels of 20 ng/mL or below.

Key takeaways

  • The extended 12-core biopsy protocol achieved a 21.8 percent higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to the standard sextant protocol alone.
  • Lateral-directed biopsy cores significantly outperformed traditional sextant cores, detecting 98.7 percent of confirmed cancer cases compared to 78.2 percent.
  • The diagnostic advantage of the 12-core approach was most notable among patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 20 ng/mL or less.

Why it matters

Prostate cancer requires accurate tissue sampling for definitive confirmation. By demonstrating that adding lateral tissue cores significantly reduces missed diagnoses compared to the older six-core method, this study offers direct evidence supporting the adoption of 12-core biopsies. This helps clinicians identify cancers earlier, especially in patients with lower prostate-specific antigen readings who might otherwise receive false-negative results.

Commercialisation angle

This research provides applied clinical evidence directly relevant to healthcare providers, urologists, and diagnostic imaging units. The 12-core transrectal ultrasound protocol relies on existing biopsy instruments and clinical workflows, representing a practice-ready diagnostic procedure rather than a new commercial product. While it does not introduce proprietary technology, it informs clinical guidelines and hospital procurement choices regarding biopsy consumables and procedural standards.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract Background: In Nigeria, prostate cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in males from middle age. The only definitive way to confirm prostate cancer is through prostate biopsy. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate has become the procedure of choice for obtaining high-quality tissue cores for histopathologic assessment in patients with suspected prostate cancer. Successive biopsy protocols have emerged to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer while maintaining its safety and tolerability. Objectives: This study aimed to compare cancer detection rates between sextant and extended 12-core biopsy protocols using TRUS-guided needle biopsy amongst patients being evaluated for prostate cancer in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective comparative hospital-based study involving patients evaluated for prostate cancer. All study participants had thorough clinical evaluation, including digital rectal examination, a serum assay for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), radiologic imaging of the prostate with TRUS and TRUS-guided extended 12-core needle biopsy of the prostate (including six-sextant and six-lateral core biopsies). Samples obtained were sent separately for histological analysis. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences ® version 22. The cancer detection rate of sextant and extended 12-core biopsies was compared, and the relationship to the clinical, radiologic, and histologic findings was analysed using Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and McNemar correlation as appropriate. The significance level ( P value) was set at 0.05. Results: In total,138 men (aged 37–89 years) were enrolled in this study and had extended 12-Core TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy. In total, 78 men (58.2%) tested positive for cancer, 52 men had benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and four men had prostatitis. Of the 78 patients positive for prostate cancer, six-sextant biopsy protocol detected 61 (78.2%), and six-lateral-directed biopsies detected 77 (98.7%), showing an improvement of 17 (20.5%) of six-lateral biopsies over six-sextant biopsy protocol. This was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). The extended 12-core biopsy protocol (combination of the two techniques) shows an overall improvement of 18 (21.8%) in cancer detection over the sextant protocol alone, which was also statistically significant ( P < 0.001). The study showed that the extended 12-core biopsy protocol was significantly superior in detecting cancer of the prostate than the sextant six-core biopsy protocol. Conclusion: This study showed that men with prostate cancer were older, had smaller prostates, and had higher PSA range levels. Increasing the number of cores taken on prostate biopsy is associated with an increase in cancer detection rate, as the extended 12-core biopsy protocol outperformed the conventional sextant protocol significantly. The improvement in detection rate was most marked in lower PSA ranges ≤20 ng/mL. Screening modalities for prostate cancer had better predictive value for prostate cancer detection in their combination.

Research topics

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Genital Health and Disease

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_15_25

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.