MARATTO

article · Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion

Towards Intelligent Tribology: Predicting Wear and Friction in WC–Co Coatings with Machine Learning

202510 citationsOpen accessUniversity of South Africa

Abstract

Abstract The present study aims to build Machine Learning (ML) models to predict the wear and coefficient of friction (CoF) for WC–Co-coated mild steel substrates. Tribological runs revealed that wear increased with sliding distance and load, ranging from 35.04 to 61.38 µm, while CoF varied from 0.0520 to 0.1795 under 20 N and remained more stable (0.1070 to 0.1186) under 30 N, indicating better frictional consistency at higher loads. Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were implemented on the experimental results and the evaluation metrics of wear prediction for both GPR (Training R 2 = 0.9999, Testing R 2 = 0.9998, RMSE = 0.0884, MAPE = 0.11) and SVR (Training R 2 = 0.9995, Testing R 2 = 0.9999, RMSE = 0.0616, MAPE = 0.10) were impressive with SVR displaying marginally more accuracy. In case of CoF, once again both GPR (Training R 2 = 1.0, Testing R 2 = 0.9999, RMSE = 0.0003, MAPE = 0.23) and SVR (Training R 2 = 0.9999, Testing R 2 = 0.9998, RMSE = 0.0004, MAPE = 0.27) performed well with GPR exhibiting marginally more accuracy. Confirmation experiments also validated that SVR best predicts wear, while GPR excels in CoF prediction. The findings prove that ML can reduce tedious experimental trials, enable optimum material selection, and optimize performance for industrial applications such as aerospace, automotive, and manufacturing. These results establish ML as a reliable tool for wear and CoF predictions and pave way towards data-driven intelligent tribology.

Research topics

  • Advanced materials and composites
  • Tribology and Wear Analysis
  • Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s40735-025-01005-9

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.