article · Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
BACKGROUND: The ideal timing for complete revascularization (CR) in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is uncertain. This meta-analysis examined outcomes of immediate CR (ICR) versus staged CR (SCR). METHODS: Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared ICR and SCR in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. The primary end points of interest were short-term and long-term all-cause mortality. Outcomes are presented as risk ratios for short-term outcomes and incidence rate ratios for long-term outcomes with 95% CIs. RESULTS: The analysis included 9 randomized controlled trials in which 4213 patients were enrolled. Short-term all-cause mortality occurred in 2.0% of patients after ICR compared with 1.2% of patients after SCR (risk ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 0.99–2.78], P =0.053; I 2 =0%). Short-term cardiac death was increased after ICR (risk ratio, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.08–4.44], P =0.03; I 2 =0%). At a median 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 4.7% of patients after ICR compared with 3.5% of patients after SCR (incidence rate ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.97–2.03], P =0.07; I 2 =0%). No significant differences were identified between the ICR and SCR strategies at either short-term or long-term follow-up for other outcomes, including myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding, and the composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, an ICR strategy may increase short-term cardiac death compared with SCR, and the possibility of increased early and late all-cause mortality cannot be excluded. Despite some uncertainty, these results currently favor a staged CR strategy for most patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; Unique identifier: CRD420251163719.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.126.016601
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.