article · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Thermoregulatory response and growth performance of FUNAAB-Alpha chickens administered sweet citrus peel powder (SCPP) were investigated in a twelve weeks experiment. A total of 360 1-day-old FUNAAB Alpha chicks were used for the study, comprising 120 birds per genotype: Normal feather (NF), Naked neck (NN) and Frizzle feather (FF). Birds were randomly allotted into 12 treatment groups: NF: 0 g, 3 g, 6 g and 9 g of SCPP, NN: 0 g, 3 g, 6 g and 9 g of SCPP, FF: 0 g, 3 g, 6 g and 9 g of SCPP. Each treatment was replicated thrice with 10 birds per replicate. No (p > 0.05) interactive and main effect of genotype and dosage of SCPP was observed on the Rectal temperature, Skin temperatures under wing and of the breast among the treatments. Similar (p > 0.05) interactive effect was observed on the respiratory rate (RR), however, higher (p < 0.001) RR was recorded in NN and FF compared with NF. Birds in the control group had the highest (p < 0.005) RR compared with birds administered 3 g and 9 g of SCPP/L of water. Interaction and main effect of SCPP dosage on heterophil (H), lymphocyte (L) and heterophil lymphocyte ratio (H/L) were not significant (p > 0.05) across the treatment groups. However, genotype significantly (p < 0.000) influenced H, L and H/L. The FF and NN had significantly (p < 0.000) lower H/L compared with the NF. Higher (p < 0.000) weight gain (WG) was observed in FF and NN compared to NF chickens. Significantly (p < 0.020) lower FCR was observed in 6 g/L (2.26), 3 g/L (2.65) and 9 g/L (2.66) of FF compared with NF on 9 g/L (4.03). Dosage of SCPP significantly (p < 0.001) influenced the relative weights of the intestine. In conclusion, lower H/L, higher WG and better FCR were observed in the NN and FF genotypes with the best FCR recorded at 6 g SCPP/L of water.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1111/jpn.14106
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.