MARATTO

book chapter · Springer proceedings in physics

The W Boson Mass Anomaly within the Inverted Scenario of the Two-Higgs Doublet Model

Abstract

Abstract In light of the recent deviation in the W boson mass measurement from the CDF-II, which significantly from the Standard Model (SM) prediction, in this paper we explore the implications of this anomaly within the framework of the Two-Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM). We focus on the scenario where the heavy CP-even H is recognized as the observed Higgs boson at 125 GeV. Our analysis, which incorporates both theoretical and current experimental constraints as well as the new CDF measurement for the W boson mass, shows that the 2HDM parameter space can provide a substantial adjustment, which aligns the predicted W mass more closely with the new CDF $$M_W$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>W</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> measurement. As a consequence, a positive mass splitting occurs between the charged Higgs boson and all other states, while the degenerate mass scenario ( $$M_{H^\pm } = M_A$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) is disfavored.

Research topics

  • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-88933-2_31

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.