MARATTO

article · Ultrastructural Pathology

The therapeutic efficacy of adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles versus infliximab in a dextran sodium sulfate induced ulcerative colitis rat model

20241 citationZagazig University

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation that is becoming of increasing incidence worldwide and has insufficient treatment. Therefore, finding effective therapies remains a priority. A dextran sodium sulfate colitis model was established to elucidate colonic layers alterations and compare adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles (MSC-MVs) versus infliximab (IFX) efficacy through biochemical, light, and electron microscope studies. Fifty-four rats were allocated to 4 groups: Control (Con), UC, UC+IFX, and UC+MSC-MVs groups. End body weights (BW) and serum malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were recorded. Colitis severity was estimated by disease activity index (DAI). Colonic specimens were processed to evaluate the histological structure, collagen content, surface mucous and goblet cells, CD44, TNF-α, and GFAP immune expression. Morphometric and statistical analyses were performed. The UC group revealed congested, stenosed colons, a significant decline in end BW, and a significant increase in serum MDA and DAI. Furthermore, disturbed histoarchitecture, inflammatory infiltration, depletion of surface mucous and goblet cells, increased collagen, and TNF-α expression and decreased GFAP expression were observed. Alterations were partially attenuated by IFX therapy, whereas MSC-MVs significantly improved all parameters. In conclusion, MSC-MVs were a superior therapeutic option, via attenuating oxidative stress and inflammatory infiltration, in addition to restoring intestinal epithelial integrity and mucosal barrier.

Research topics

  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Inflammasome and immune disorders

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/01913123.2024.2426566

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.