article · Resources Policy
The global transition towards green energy technologies heavily depends on critical minerals, particularly lithium, where projected demand significantly outstrips current supply. Known mineral deposits and downstream capacities are geographically concentrated, mostly in developing nations, while consumption is dominated by developed countries. These imbalances, combined with geopolitical rivalries and environmental concerns, have driven resource nationalisation, trade realignments, and strategic alliances. To address these dynamics, a collaborative framework modelled on OPEC is proposed for mineral-exporting nations, termed Green Energy-Mineral Exporting Countries, or GEMEC. Focusing on lithium as a prototype because its concentrated geography facilitates coordinated production, GEMEC would serve as a platform for producer countries. Through coordinated export and output policies, member nations could strengthen their geopolitical influence, maximise domestic economic returns, and collectively manage the environmental, social, and governance challenges associated with the green energy transition.
The global shift to renewable technologies relies heavily on stable supplies of critical minerals such as lithium. Because resource ownership is concentrated in developing nations and consumption in developed countries, shifting geopolitical dynamics could reshape global supply chains. Understanding how exporter alliances might form helps governments and industries anticipate market stability, raw material availability, and broader economic impacts during the clean energy transition.
This study outlines a macro-level policy and governance framework rather than a technical extraction process or commercial product. The concepts could inform mineral ministries, trade negotiators, and state-backed resource enterprises seeking collective bargaining or coordinated market strategies. As a conceptual proposal exploring geopolitical scenarios and trade organisation models, it remains at a very early, theoretical stage with no direct technological commercialisation pathway indicated in the abstract.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
The energy sector is currently undergoing a transition towards increased utilization of green energy technologies. The green energy transition relies heavily on metals, such as aluminium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lithium, manganese, nickel, rare earth elements (REEs), silicon, tin, titanium, tungsten and zinc, among others. However, this transition occurs within the context of: (1) a geographical concentration of known mineral deposits and downstream capability; (2) a demand that vastly exceeds supply; (3) a strong drive to mitigate environmental and energy concerns; and (4) an increasing level of geopolitical conflicts. Consequently, the energy transition is not straightforward, as it intensifies material demand, market and geopolitical competition. This is especially true for lithium which is pivotal in this transformation. Concerns driven by material access, energy sustainability and national sufficiency are increasingly resulting in national and super-national geopolitical activities, such as resource nationalisation, forming strategic or trade alliances, encouraging near- and friend-shoring, promoting material circularity, and accelerating green technology research and deployment. This study examines the global impact of the green energy transition, from the perspective of the mineral value chain, including downstream products, its implications on the projected demand, and geopolitics. There are many potential outcomes in the future, depending on: (1) the pragmatic outcomes of the energy transition, which is only empirically realizable through implementation; (2) the strength of independence and global stability; and (3) the rise of regional or friendly trade blocs. In particular, this study examines a future scenario in which there is an emergence of an OPEC-style organisation for green energy minerals and metals (GEMMs), focusing on lithium as an example, because: (1) it has a clear and essential role in the green energy transition; (2) it is geographically concentrated in a manner that facilitates production coordination; and (3) it is overwhelmingly consumed by developed nations but supplied by developing nations. An organisation built around lithium could be a prototype to other GEMM markets. Consequently, we propose that it is possible to leverage existing circumstances and propose that such an organisation, here termed Green Energy-Mineral Exporting Countries, or “GEMEC”, could serve as a collaborative platform to enhance geopolitical positioning, maximise economic benefits through coordinated production and export policies, and address the environmental, social and governance challenges associated with the green energy transition.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104737
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
