article · The American Journal of Bioethics
We argue against the widely assumed view that clinical ethicists have an important role to play in helping to alleviate the moral distress of clinicians. When moral distress causes pathological psychological states it properly falls within the domain of mental health professionals. Where moral distress appears to be the result of a clinician's true normative beliefs, the ethicist should not convince them otherwise. Where the normative beliefs causing distress are false, clinical ethicists do not have any special ability to persuade clinicians to give up those normative beliefs. At best, successfully alleviating moral distress may be an unsought, accidental byproduct of addressing ethical concerns. Our discussion points to the need for more clarity around the appropriate professional scope for clinical ethicists.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2026.2657873
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.