MARATTO

article · NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

The prognostic significance of the Rockall score evaluation in patients admitted for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Yaoundé (Cameroon)

2023Open accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major emergency. The Rockall score (RS) could be a tool to predict the outcome of patients regarding their risk of re-bleeding and/or death 30 days after admission. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the RS in patients admitted for UGIB in Yaoundé (Cameroon). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at two emergency units inYaoundé. We included 101 patients admitted from 2020 to 2021 for a UGIB and obtained the sociodemographic, clinical, and paraclinical data. The outcome 30 days after the admission was assessed (re-bleeding and/or death). We calculated the RS and analyzed the association of an RS ≥ 5 with the death of the patient and/or a re-bleeding 30 days after admission. Results: The mean age of patients was 48.5 years, 75 of the 101 were males (74.3%). The main bleeding lesions were portal hypertension in 35 patients (34.7%), gastric ulcers in 32 patients (31.7%), and duodenal ulcers in 30 patients (29.7%). During the 30 days after the admission, we recorded re-bleeding in 21 patients (20.8%) and death in 9 patients (8.9%). The RS was ≥ 5 in 49 patients (48.5%), and this was significantly associated with the re-bleeding (RR 4.5; CI 95% 1.631–12.459; P = 0.001) and with the death ( P = 0.001). Conclusion: The RS ≥ 5 is associated with a risk of re-bleeding and/or death in patients admitted for a UGIB in Yaoundé regardless of the aetiology.

Research topics

  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/njgh.njgh_9_23

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.