MARATTO

article · International Journal of Research in Economics and Finance

The Intellectual Structure of Educational Equity and Social Justice

2026Open accessUniversité Ibn Zohr

Abstract

Educational equity and social justice have emerged as central paradigms in contemporary socio-educational research and policy frameworks. Despite a rapidly growing body of literature, scholarship in this domain remains structurally fragmented across sociology, urban planning, educational technology, and public administration. This study presents a comprehensive scientometric and bibliometric synthesis of global scientific production indexed in Scopus from 1981 to 2026, analyzing a cleaned corpus of 1,415 primary articles published across 735 peer-reviewed sources. Utilizing non-linear growth modeling, Bradford’s Law, Lotka’s Law, and keyword co-occurrence network analysis, this research delineates the field’s intellectual structure, collaboration patterns, and thematic evolution. The results demonstrate a sustained exponential growth in publication volume, with a non-linear logistic growth model (R2 = 0.963) predicting a theoretical carrying capacity ceiling of K = 7,041 cumulative documents and an inflection point at year 2033.6 (356 articles/year). Bradford’s distribution identifies 57 core flagship journals accounting for 33.36% of total output. Keyword co-occurrence network mapping uncovers five primary thematic clusters: socio-spatial inequalities, digital equity and algorithmic justice, higher education access and institutional governance, critical pedagogy, and policy implementation. By bridging disconnected disciplinary streams, this study establishes a unified baseline for researchers, policymakers, and educational leaders seeking to advance inclusive governance and social justice in education.

Research topics

  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Digital Education and Society

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.71420/ijref.v3i8-2.386

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.