article · Geocarto International
Landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) rely on statistical association for weighting the impact of each predictive factor class. However, the effects of using different training datasets and causative factors combinations on the accuracy of the results are rarely discussed. Accordingly, we investigated the effects of training data and computation technique selection on the accuracy and performance of LSMs. Results show that including relict landslides in the training data diminishes the accuracy of the LSMs compared to models that exclude such processes from the input. As for the effect of choosing different combinations of predictive variables, it was shown to be less significant. After investigating association and causality between predictive variables, the best performing models produced using frequency ratio and logistic regression tend to be more accurate than those including all variables. As for the artificial neural networks, it seems to outperform other models. Indeed, such investigations are beneficial for improving LSMs.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2028905
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.