article · Discover Agriculture
Abstract The accurate measurement of agricultural productivity and its consequential effects on the welfare of farmers plays a pivotal role in economies heavily dependent on agriculture. This study delves into the repercussions of employing standard weights and measures on both productivity and welfare in the Ruvuma Region of Tanzania. Employing a cross-sectional design, primary data were collected from 557 households selected at random from six districts within Ruvuma region. Utilizing negative binomial and multiple regression models, the study scrutinizes the impact of standard weights and measures on maize productivity and farmer welfare. The findings elucidate a noteworthy correlation between the adoption of standard units and amplified maize productivity and cash income. Farmers utilizing standard measurements in maize transactions exhibited a 19.5% higher yield per acre and a 14.5% improvement in welfare compared to those adhering to traditional measuring methods. Influential factors such as sex, the quantity of maize produced, and land size significantly influenced the adoption of standard units. Recommending empowerment initiatives through government agencies and pertinent organizations, this study advocates for targeted training and sensitization to redirect small-holder farmers from traditional measuring practices. Such endeavours align with Sustainable Development Goal 2, contributing to the overarching aim of achieving zero hunger by 2030.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s44279-024-00029-y
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.