book chapter · Business, management and economics
This study examines the impact of US and UN economic sanctions on income inequality in African- and Asian-targeted states from 1980–2019, using the Bayesian Generalized Method of Moment’s (BGMM) technique. One essential weapon of international politics for promoting peaceful international cohabitation is the imposition of political and economic sanctions, despite ongoing debates on the effectiveness of punishments in generating disutility. The BGMM was chosen due to its ability to address the dynamics of several entities in the data. The study reveals a positive relationship between economic sanctions and income inequality, except for pre-tax income held by the top 10%, indicating a significant contribution to income inequality. The study further finds that African countries seem to suffer the most from the execution of these sanctions compared to Asian countries. From a policy perspective, the study suggests implementing targeted assistance programs such as financial support and job training programs for vulnerable groups, such as low-income workers and small businesses, affected by sanctions. Additionally, policymakers should prioritize investments in less-impacted sectors, creating alternative job opportunities, and reducing income disparities. This approach can mitigate the negative effects of economic sanctions on income inequality by addressing specific needs and diversifying the economy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004854
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.