article · Croatian Review of Economic Business and Social Statistics
The asymmetric impact of urbanisation on poverty reduction was examined for South Africa employing data from 1990 to 2022. The study was motivated by the need to establish the effects of positive and negative shocks on poverty reduction. The study used the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model (NARDL). The study is timely as it is conducted at a time when most countries, including South Africa, are trying to recover from the COVID-19 global pandemic, which led to a surge in poverty levels. The study found that positive and negative shocks of urbanisation are only instrumental in poverty reduction in the short run. In the long run, positive and negative shocks of urbanisation have no significant effect whatsoever on poverty reduction. The study also found that the effects of positive shocks were more dominant than negative shocks on poverty reduction. The findings of the study point to the importance of urbanisation in poverty reduction in the short run. Policy implications are discussed.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.62366/crebss.2024.2.002
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.