MARATTO

review · Reviews in Medical Virology

The Impact of HIV Upon the PCI Results: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the latest evidences and summarise the impact of HIV on PCI outcomes. A PRISMA guided literature search was conducted on 14 February 2024 in Web of Science, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Google Scholar and Scopus. We searched with the term '("percutaneous coronary intervention" OR "PCI") AND ("human immunodeficiency virus" OR "HIV" OR "acquired immunodeficiency syndrome" OR "AIDS")' after selecting the keywords from randomly chosen included papers. We included 8 papers of 781 screened records. HIV (+) patients had significant in-hospital, 1-year and overall (event at the last follow up point) all-cause mortality compared to HIV (-) group (OR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.57-1.90, p < 0.01), (OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.07-1.81, p = 0.01) and (OR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.55-1.85, p < 0.01), respectively. HIV (+) patients had significantly higher odds of developing MACE (OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.12-1.62, p = 0.001) compared to the HIV (-) group. No differences between both groups were detected regarding in-hospital and overall CV mortality, TVR, TLR, post-PCI TIMI grade 3 flow, cerebrovascular accidents and recurrent coronary events (p > 0.05). Our study revealed that people with HIV who underwent PCI in this modern era may have worse short and long-term PCI outcomes. This finding highlights the need for specialised cardiovascular care protocols for the HIV population. However, enhanced clinical management and preventative measures are imperative to improve PCI success rates in patients with HIV.

Research topics

  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2572

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.