MARATTO

article · Materials

The Impact of Confinement Configurations on the Compressive Behavior of CFRP—Wrapped Concrete Cylinders

20253 citationsOpen accessUniversity Ferhat Abbas of Setif

Abstract

Experimental tests on confined concrete specimens are essential to characterize the mechanisms activated under varying degrees of confinement. Such characterization is critical for understanding how full, partial, and non-uniform wrapping configurations influence strength and ductility enhancements. This study investigates the compressive behavior of concrete cylinders (160 mm × 320 mm) confined using full, partial, and non-uniform carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) configurations. In the first phase, all wrapping schemes were applied with equivalent quantities of CFRP, enabling a direct performance comparison under material parity. The results indicate that non-uniform confinement (NUC) achieved approximately 15% higher axial strength than full confinement (FC2) using the same amount of CFRP. In the second phase, the NUC configuration was tested with 25% less CFRP material, yet the reduction in strength was limited to about 3%, demonstrating its superior efficiency. A new predictive model was developed to estimate peak axial stress and strain in CFRP-confined concrete cylinders. Compared to existing models, the proposed model demonstrated greater predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.98 for stress and 0.91 for strain) and reduced error metrics (RMSE and scatter index). ANOVA confirmed the statistical significance of the model’s predictions (p < 0.00001 for stress, p = 0.002 for strain). These findings highlight the performance advantages and material efficiency of non-uniform CFRP confinement and support the utility of the proposed model as a practical design tool for developing advanced confinement strategies in structural engineering.

Research topics

  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Smart Materials for Construction

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ma18153559

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.