MARATTO

article · BMC Nursing

The impact of ambidextrous leadership on innovative work behavior among critical care nurses: a cross-sectional study

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Innovation is vital in high-acuity healthcare settings, yet engagement in innovative work behavior (IWB) among nurses remains limited. Ambidextrous leadership, which integrates explorative and exploitative styles, may enhance nurses’ innovation capacity. To examine the influence of ambidextrous leadership behaviors on innovative work behavior among critical care nurses. A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 360 nurses in critical care units at a major educational hospital in Egypt. Data was collected over 2 months in 2024 using the Ambidextrous Leadership Questionnaire and the Innovative Behavior Inventory. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and regression analyses were used to assess relationships between study variables. The mean score for nurses’ perception of ambidextrous leadership was 40.10 ± 5.69, and for innovative work behavior was 66.03 ± 8.35. Both values reflect moderate levels. Ambidextrous leadership was positively correlated with IWB (r = 0.483, p < 0.001). Exploitative leadership showed a stronger correlation with IWB (r = 0.466) compared with explorative leadership (r = 0.381). Regression analysis further confirmed that ambidextrous leadership significantly predicted IWB (β = 0.304, R² = 0.625, p < 0.001). Ambidextrous leadership is a significant driver of innovative behavior among critical care nurses. By balancing creativity with clinical discipline, nurse leaders can foster innovation without compromising care quality. These findings highlight the importance of developing ambidextrous leadership skills to promote innovation in critical care practice. Not applicable.

Research topics

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Nursing education and management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-04232-0

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.