MARATTO

article · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences

The geographies of ethics in Digital Humanities research: A critical analysis

Abstract

This paper explored the geographies of ethics in digital humanities research, examining how ethical practices are shaped by spatial, political, and social contexts. For the purpose of this research, the concept of geographies is understood not solely in spatial terms, but as psycho-social and socio-political spaces that are recursively constructed through research processes. Digital humanities represent a significant shift in the humanities and social sciences, blending computational technologies with critical, humanistic inquiry. As digital methods become increasingly central to research, they raise ethical concerns that demand careful reflection, particularly in relation to where and how research is conducted, funded, and reported. The central research question guiding this study is whether digital humanities research sufficiently recognizes and engages with the ethical implications of diverse geographies. Drawing on a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed articles and scholarly analyses, the study employed thematic synthesis to identify recurring concerns and patterns. The findings highlight tensions between technological standards and context-sensitive ethical frameworks, showing how digital technologies may both support and constrain ethical engagement across different geographical and institutional contexts. By mapping the ethical dimensions of digital humanities research through a geographic lens, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how ethics are enacted unevenly in global research landscapes, especially as digitalization continues to reshape scholarly practice.

Research topics

  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.38159/ehass.20267211

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.