article · PLOS Global Public Health
BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality remains a catastrophic condition for reproductive-age women in Tanzania. Inadequate ANC visits impair the efficiency of education programs for pregnant women on obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness, hence negatively influencing health behaviour and decision-making processes, contributing to maternal mortality. In this case, a complementary health education intervention for pregnant women in the community is necessary. M-MAMA Champions were introduced to determine their effectiveness in creating awareness of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness complication readiness and their practice to complement the health system. METHODS: A parallel arms, cluster-randomized pragmatic implementation trial, whereby pregnant women were recruited from four clusters and randomised at a ratio of 1:1. M-MAMA Champions empowered pregnant women with obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness in addition to standard care. Difference-in-difference analysis determined the intervention's effect. RESULTS: The majority of 124 pregnant women recruited from intervention (N = 60) and control (N = 64) arms, were aged 16 to 19, 31.3% (n = 20) vs 20 to 24, 35.0% (n = 21) and had primary education 48.4% (n = 31) vs 51.7% (n = 31) in the control and intervention arms respectively. Awareness of Obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness complication readiness and their practice improved significantly by 64.2%, (P < 0.0001), 26.3%, (P = 0.00190 and 33.9%, (P = 0.0006) respectively. CONCLUSION: M-MAMA Champions, the facilitators of women groups in community engagement are effective in improving awareness of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women. It's, therefore worth an adoption for wider application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06325319 (Effect of Community Engagement Using M-Mama Champions), registered on 15th March 2024.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004315
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.